Mainstream scholarship holds that Galatians 4: Mainstream scholarship holds that it recalls the earthly life of Jesus "in the context of cultic rites that assumed his divinity. According to a longstanding consensus, the oldest Christology was an "exaltation Christology," according to which Jesus was subsequently "raised to divine status.
There is much I like in this comment and discussion: I disagree with your cultural analysis of holiness. The Apostles defined holiness as an abstract quality but not an Hellenization thesis quality nor as an unquantifiable quality. I think the living definition gets inculturated or intellctualized to the point of literally squeezing out the holiness of Christianity in the daily lives of believers because they have to ascribe to a "higher" or "more educated" authority on holiness.
Peter said we are a "priesthood of believers" and the by folowing the law by abiding in the Spirit that we will be rendered neither useless or ineffective for the kingdom - 2 Peter.
Furthermore, the use of the word Teleios - used in Mt 5: In short, holiness is entirely expected to be understood first by the revelation of Holy Spirt upon conversion and subsequently through a life of discpleship through scriptural mentoring.
The idea that holiness is relative from a believer's standpoint is unscriptural but the idea that holiness has been tainted and redefined through govt control, i.
Constantine and quarrelling bishops is a very academic and real cultural issue that is best flushed out in the academy of research. Academics can provide a cold hard look at such things-especially relativism-that give us a more basic look at the people involved.
Such was the case with Constantine. Thus, holiness is quantifiable according to scripture-the source alone that is the church's guide to living Christianity. However, holiness defined by any outside influence save the word of God, is a political voice and not the voice of the Holy Spirit lest we fall victim to the very words in Deuteronomy and revelation.
Do you as you said believe that "The Apostles defined holiness as an abstract quality? Many of the truths we hold in our faith are held in tension, seemingly fighting against each other.
I am arguing that our lives reflect Christ, but not perfectly.
In fact, we are striving to work out our salvation with fear and tremblng. We forget what is behind and strive forward. We press on knowing that we have not attained Now we see through a glass or mirror dimly "in enigma" in the Greek.
But then you say that holiness IS quantifiable. And can you please define it for me? Just be careful, lest you be "adding" to the scriptural testimony. Again, I really like much of what B.
I see your point about seeing through glass darkly. I think what I am trying to communicate is more simple than it appears. Holiness is an abstrtact principle to the world and in academic an unquantifiable thing and treated subjectively.If there is one Sunday out of the year that presents unavoidable problems for preachers it is Palm Sunday.
What do we do with this triumphal parade when we . In our experience, however, these things just don’t stay dead. And so the next time the Hellenization thesis tries to claw its way out of the ground, we’ll know to call Mr.
Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for God Is Impassible and Impassioned: Toward a Theology of Divine Emotion at leslutinsduphoenix.com Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users.
In his widely praised book on NT Christology, Richard Bauckham writes: The term identity is mine, not that of the ancient literature, but I use it as a label for what I do find in the literature, which is not, of course, necessarily a notion precisely the same as modern ideas of personal identity, but is nevertheless clearly a concern with who God is.
Feb 09, · 2 thoughts on “ Harnack’s Hellenization Thesis, Heretics, and Evangelizing Metaphysics: Thomas Torrance and Thomas Aquinas ” cal February 10, at am. Bravo! I’m with you, %, on this. I think there is a difference between syncretism and inculturation.
The Christ myth theory (also known as the Jesus myth theory, Jesus mythicism, or Jesus ahistoricity theory) is "the view that the person known as Jesus of Nazareth had no historical existence." Alternatively, in terms given by Bart Ehrman as per his criticism of mythicism, "the historical Jesus did not exist.
Or if he did, he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity.".