So we confine the scope of IT, as used by Carr in his article, to the resources as mentioned above.
The word "disease" denotes a demonstrable biological process that affects the bodies of living organisms plants, animals, and humans.
The term "mental illness" refers to the undesirable thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of persons. Classifying thoughts, feelings, and behaviors as diseases is a logical and semantic error, like classifying the whale as a fish. As the whale is not a fish, mental illness is not a disease.
Individuals with brain diseases bad brains or kidney diseases bad kidneys are literally sick. Individuals with mental diseases bad behaviorslike societies with economic diseases bad fiscal policiesare metaphorically sick.
The classification of mis behavior as illness provides an ideological justification for state-sponsored social control as medical treatment. Separation of Psychiatry and the State. If we recognize that "mental illness" is a metaphor for disapproved thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, we are compelled to recognize as well that the primary function of Psychiatry is to control thought, mood, and behavior.
Hence, like Church and State, Psychiatry and the State ought to be separated by a "wall. The role of psychiatrists It doesnt matter summary mental health experts with regard to law, the school system, and other organizations ought to be similar to the role of clergymen in those situations.
Because being accused of mental illness is similar to being accused of crime, we ought to presume that psychiatric "defendants" are mentally competent, just as we presume that criminal defendants are legally innocent.
Individuals charged with criminal, civil, or interpersonal offenses ought never to be treated as incompetent solely on the basis of the opinion of mental health experts.
Incompetence ought to be a judicial determination and the "accused" ought to have access to legal representation and a right to trial by jury.
Abolition of involuntary mental hospitalization. Involuntary mental hospitalization is imprisonment under the guise of treatment; it is a covert form of social control that subverts the rule of law.
No one ought to be deprived of liberty except for a criminal offense, after a trial by jury guided by legal rules of evidence.
No one ought to be detained against his will in a building called "hospital," or in any other medical institution, or on the basis of expert opinion. Medicine ought to be clearly distinguished and separated from penology, treatment from punishment, the hospital from the prison.
Abolition of the insanity defense. Insanity is a legal concept involving the courtroom determination that a person is not capable of forming conscious intent and, therefore, cannot be held responsible for an otherwise criminal act.
The opinions of experts about the "mental state" of defendants ought to be inadmissible in court, exactly as the opinions of experts about the "religious state" of defendants are inadmissible.
No one ought to be excused of lawbreaking or any other offense on the basis of so-called expert opinion rendered by psychiatric or mental health experts.
|Although his article was compelling from the standpoint of conjecture, it provided very little quantitative evidence to back his statements.|
Excusing a person of responsibility for an otherwise criminal act on the basis of inability to form conscious intent is an act of legal mercy masquerading as an act of medical science. Being merciful or merciless toward lawbreakers is a moral and legal matter, unrelated to the actual or alleged expertise of medical and mental health professionals.
InAmericans were confronted with the task of abolishing slavery, peacefully and without violating the rights of others.
They refused to face that daunting task and we are still paying the price of their refusal. Inwe Americans are faced with the task of abolishing psychiatric slavery, peacefully and without violating the rights of others.
We accept that task and are committed to working for its successful resolution. As Americans before us have eventually replaced involuntary servitude chattel slavery with contractual relations between employers and employees, we seek to replace involuntary psychiatry psychiatric slavery with contractual relations between care givers and clients.
Thomas Szasz March Thomas S. Szasz Cybercenter for Liberty and Responsibility:Properties describe matter.
A block of wood, milk, and air all have properties. All the material on earth is in three states-solid, liquid, and leslutinsduphoenix.com "state" of the matter refers to the group of matter .
“Fireworks” is a strange little movie that attempts the tricky feat of combining comedy, drama, sci-fi and romance, but it doesn’t get those individual elements right so it never coheres as a whole.
Nick Carr's article "IT Doesn't Matter" was published in in Harvard Business Review in May and ignited an industry firestorm for its perceived dismissal of the strategic value of IT.
The landowners were driven by a desire to protect their own interests rather than those of the people. But the resulting document, which has no legal force today in this country, was a key.
Okay to be serious here. I think this is a great summary of many of the object-level arguments of reaction. Now, one potential takeaway is “Okay, so if I had .
This Digest is a faithful summary of two leading scientific consensus reports produced in and by the World Health Organization (WHO): ' Health Aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide ()' and ' Answer to follow-up questions from CAFE ()'.